I'll bet you didn't see this Amy Barrett Coming

[Dave's Not Here Man]

www.newsweek.com/supreme-court-rejects-religious-exemptions-vaccine-mandates-6-3-maine-ruling-1644144

I sure didn't, not with her anyway. However, wasn't she a clerk or something for Scalia? Most people don't know, and I can't recall the case, that Scalia wrote an opinion for the majority in a big decision years ago re religious exemptions. I do remember him saying that (not quoting) basically religious exemptions cannot take precedent over the compelling interest/s of the country. Pretty easy to put that into context. 

It will very interesting to see how the challenges to Roe are dealt with. I hope to be surprised again.

[bobathon]

I'll be surprised if they preserve Roe.

[minx]

Roe is gone - the major thing to worry about is the wording and reasoning they use on the case to strike it down.

We were all damn stupid - the moment Roe passed, we should have switched the fight to the statehouse and made damn sure protections were in place in case it was repealed. Cause the 'pro-life' crowd has always been a bunch of rabid weasels with only one goal - eliminate anything that would allow someone to have sex outside of marriage, or that would allow a woman autonomy.