|
Post by Dave's Not Here Man on Apr 1, 2020 10:50:24 GMT -5
Would still like to see them really go "all out" with the info, like the person who just passed in the area from COVID19. I think they could reveal the info on these charts from the article, and possible give some other important statistics without violating his or her privacy/HIPAA www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/04/01/824874977/underlying-health-disparities-could-mean-coronavirus-hits-some-communities-hardeBut when you still have entire families heading out to the store, kids, grandma, and the dogs and all... the stats won't really mean that much in terms of what effects the info can have on the course of the virus, because some people are just too stupid to digest it.
|
|
|
Post by minx on Apr 1, 2020 13:05:55 GMT -5
Yeah, without identifying people, I really think we need to see some statistics like
Newest cases 5 unrelated people who went to the park together - one week ago 10 unrelated people who had a BBQ - 3 weeks ago 30 unrelated people who attended a church service 10 days ago
Etc - start showing people that it's not some mysterious thing that just 'happened', or that if you don't travel you're good.
Let people know - visiting your good friend and sitting next to them on the couch is not a great thing to do. Going to church can be dangerous, regardless of what your nutcase pastor tells you. Petting that cute dog at the park puts you too close to the owner.
And that you can have this and not realize it. Therefore you can pass it to your kindly old neighbor accidentally. Try listening to actual doctors and scientists.
|
|